Cosmic tape measure

The second ground-based tracking system determined the range or distance to the spacecraft by measuring delay. Most people are familiar with the annoying delay introduced into television interviews carried out over satellite links. It takes light, and therefore radio about one and a quarter seconds to travel from the Moon to Earth, so the return travel time for a signal to a spacecraft at the Moon is about two and a half seconds. Engineers used this delay to measure range by putting a marker onto the radio signal which the spacecraft preserved and returned to Earth. The marker consisted of a digital code called pseudo-random noise, essentially a very large random number carefully chosen not to add undesirable artefacts to the radio spectrum. When the spacecraft synthesised the downlink carrier using the 240/221 relationship, it preserved this code, and sent it back to Earth. Engineers recovered the code and compared it with the transmitted code, 'sliding' one over the other until they matched. The amount of 'slide' yielded a time for the round trip, and hence, knowing the speed of light which is fixed, the distance. This technique was powerful enough to measure a spacecraft's distance with an accuracy of better than 30 metres, and it could do so to a distance of nearly a million kilometres. For all of these ground-based systems, the movement of the ground station due to the rotation of Earth had to be taken into account before deriving measurements of the state vector.

NAVIGATION FROM THE SPACECRAFT

An entirely different method of determining position and velocity was used in the spacecraft, which relied on sightings of the stars, Earth and the Moon. It was designed by MIT under the direction of Charles Stark Draper. To reinforce his faith that his team could successfully come up with an accurate system to navigate to the Moon and back, and to the mirth of folks at NASA, he put himself forward as an astronaut candidate. The MIT system was based on a computer, an inertial platform, and optical devices that were directly descended from an instrument used by generations of sailors to navigate across the world.

On the side of the command module opposite the hatch, were two apertures in the hull that accommodated the spacecraft's optics. The smaller was for a so-called telescope, although it hardly justified the name as it had only a 'times-one' magnification. Neil Armstrong later quipped, ''NASA is probably the only organisation in history that's been sold a one-power telescope.'' Its function was to give the CMP a wide-angle overview of the constellations visible at that side of the spacecraft as an aid to pointing the other instrument, the sextant.

The second aperture in the hull was a disk and slit affair that accommodated the objective optic of the sextant, a 28-power device used by the CMP to measure angles. Like a mariner's sextant, it had two lines of sight with the ability to move one with respect to the other. The version used by marine navigators for hundreds of years works by viewing the horizon through a small telescope mounted on an arc which

Apollo 17 commander, Eugene Cernan, in front of the optics panel on board America.

sweeps through one-sixth of a circle (hence the name 'sextant'). A mirror arrangement on a radial arm permits the image of a celestial body (the Sun, Moon or a star) to be aligned with the view of the horizon. The angle between the two could then be read off a scale at the circumference of the arc. If carried out when the Sun was at its highest point, this measurement could yield the ship's latitude.

The role of the sextant on the Apollo spacecraft was similarly to measure angles, and it worked in much the same way, but with huge refinements. It also had two lines of sight - one fixed, the other movable - both of which peered through the slitted disk in the spacecraft's skin. The fixed line of sight, also called the landmark line of sight (LLOS), had to be aimed by controlling the attitude of the entire spacecraft. A dense filter was placed in its light path so that the relatively bright horizons of Earth or the Moon would not swamp the stars with which they were to be compared. The movable line of sight was usually aimed at a star, and was thus called the star line of sight (SLOS). It could be swung up to 57 degrees away from the fixed line of sight to bring the image of a star into alignment with the image of the horizon. It was important that the star image be placed on that part of the horizon that was nearest to or furthest away from the star, depending on which horizon was lit. Because the computer was closely integrated with the optics, the angle between the two lines of sight could be directly fed to it and used in its calculations of the state vector. The entire optical head could be rotated about the fixed line of sight and, as it did so, the disk on the outer surface of the spacecraft also turned to accommodate it. A crude sextant had been tested during the Gemini programme with mixed results. Mike Collins had tried using two hand-held models without success on Gemini 10. Later on Gemini 12, Buzz Aldrin brought one into play to help with angle measurement during a rendezvous after the spacecraft's rendezvous radar had failed.

This ability to measure the angle between a planet's horizon and a star was what enabled onboard determination of the state vector to work. As a spacecraft coasts from one world to another, the apparent position of either orb against the stars will change, and this change will reflect the progress of the craft along its trajectory. The angle between the planet and the star at a particular time can only be valid for a single trajectory given the laws of celestial mechanics and the layout of our solar system. It can therefore be used by an onboard computer to calculate their current state vector. Repeated measurements could be used to refine the state vector. Because Program 23 in the computer was being used for this task, crews referred to their navigation task as doing a 'P23'.

One of the problems encountered when this system was being finalised was the difficulty of knowing exactly where the horizon of a planet was. Firstly, there a 50:50 chance that the point on a planet's horizon nearest the star being used would be in darkness. To work around this, the CMP had to tell the computer whether he was using the nearest point or, if it was dark, the furthest point of the horizon relative to the star he was using. The second problem was that optical navigation was most sensitive when the spacecraft was near the planet on whose horizon the CMP was trying to sight. Unfortunately, the nearer they were to Earth or to the Moon, the less well-defined was the horizon. In the case of Earth the atmosphere blurred the precise edge of its limb, and the rough terrain on the Moon could make its limb decidedly knobbly when observed up close. Based on the pioneering work of Jim Lovell, who proved the onboard guidance system during Apollo 8, MIT set up a simulator to train the astronauts how to choose an appropriate horizon when trying to mark on a nearby Earth or Moon.

During the flights, the CMPs made it a matter of pride to excel in their navigation exercises, even though, in CMP Jim L°veU sighting through Ap°n° 8's most cases, their results were only scanning telescope. meant as a backup in case commu nications were lost. Nevertheless, a friendly rivalry existed between some crews and the trajectory experts on Earth as to whose evaluation of the state vector was the most accurate. When Lovell put the onboard navigation system through its paces for the first time, there was a lot of interest in his results. Two days out from Earth on Apollo 8, and one day from the Moon, Lovell informed mission control of his progress with the P23 navigation work. "It might be interesting to note that after sightings, we ran out P21, and we got a pericynthion of 66.8 [nautical] miles.''

Lovell had used P21 in the spacecraft's computer. He had simply entered a time and the computer returned an altitude above the Moon's surface for that time based on its calculations using his state vector. As he knew roughly when they should arrive, he tried entering times at 10-minute intervals around their expected closest approach. With each advancing time entered, he noted how their predicted altitude above the lunar surface dropped, reached a minimum value, and then began to rise again. The point where it reached a minimum was their pericynthion - the spacecraft's closest approach to the Moon. The point Lovell was making to mission control was that his predicted value for the pericynthion was very near the ideal of 60 nautical miles (110 kilometres). Bill Anders's wit intervened. "I knew if he did it long enough, he'd finally get one that was close.''

Lovell continued making P23 measurements and checked his resultant state vector once again with P21. Frank Borman informed Mike Collins in Houston of his results. "Mike, we ran the latest state vector we have through the P21, and it showed the pericynthion at 69.7 [nautical] miles. We've got the navigator, par excellence.'' This may have been a gentle dig at Collins, who had originally been CMP on the Apollo 8 crew until he had to withdraw to undergo surgery. Nevertheless, the flight controllers were impressed. "You can tell Jim he is getting pretty ham-handed with that P21,'' congratulated Collins. "He got a perilune altitude three-tenths of a mile off what we are predicting down here. Apparently, he got 69.7 [nautical miles], and the RTCC says 70.'' The RTCC was the real time computer complex, a bank of huge IBM-360 mainframe computers at mission control that were processing the radio tracking data.

Thus, at the first outing of the Apollo navigation system, two entirely different systems were coming up with determinations of the spacecraft's position that agreed to within 500 metres at a range of 300,000 kilometres out from Earth. It was a huge confidence boost, proving that the engineers had done their work well. Procedure dictated that Lovell's determination would be noted, but the crew would be instructed to place a switch into the correct position to accept data uplinked from the ground, whereby the Earth-based solution would be sent up by radio and loaded directly into the onboard computer's memory where it would supplant Lovell's effort. Apollo 8's navigator saw the opportunity for a little one-upmanship.

"Houston, Apollo 8,'' called Lovell.

"Apollo 8, Houston,'' replied Collins.

Lovell then jokingly reversed the usual procedure. "Roger. If you put your [telemetry switch] to Accept, we will send you our state vector.'' Mission control had no such switch and the request was in jest. But Lovell knew his state vector was as good as theirs and Collins knew it too. "Touche,'' Collins responded.

Later, as Apollo 8 coasted back towards Earth and Lovell continued his P23 navigation exercises, it was hard to say whether his solution or the one from Earth was better. Jerry Carr informed the commander: "Frank. Let him know the state vectors have converged. They are very, very close now.''

"Is that right, Jerry?" replied Borman. "Okay. I'll tell him. Thank you.''

"Don't let his head get big, though,'' suggested Carr.

"You guys are going to make it impossible to live with him,'' moaned Borman. "It always was pretty hard.''

A day later, Lovell was doing even better. Carr brought the bad news. "I hate to tell you this, Frank, but that last set of marks put your state vector right on top of the [ground's] state vector.'' Borman returned with a mock plea. "Come off that, Jerry. Come on; you promised.''

0 0

Responses

  • RITA
    How to measure apollo tape?
    6 years ago

Post a comment