Conclusion

The universal genetic code was constructed in two phases. A predecessor code for environmentally derived Phase 1 amino acids underwent expansion to include biosynthetically derived Phase 2 amino acids. In the process the Phase 2 product amino acids received codons from their Phase 1 precursors. This expansion, by breaking up the original codon domains of the precursors, created a strangely structured code with seemingly irrational features such as the unequal allocations of one to six codons to different amino acids, split codon domains for Ser, placement ofthe codons ofphysi-cally dissimilar Cys and Trp in the same UGN box and the partial use of a codon by Pyl and Sec. Despite this strange structure, the reigning objective of the expansion, viz. to enhance the capabilities of the encoded ensemble of amino acid sidechains, was superbly accomplished. This ensemble has provided the variety and balance of sidechains for the remarkable performance of proteins manifest in the catalytic perfection of diffusion controlled enzymes where the rate of catalyzed reaction is only limited by diffusion of substrate into the enzyme active site,71 the development of multicellular life and the advent of human intelligence, arts and sciences. After a deep freeze for three billion years, the code is experimentally thawed since 1983 and its intrinsic mutability is once again making possible code expansion to yield synthetic life forms using synthetic genetic codes.

In evolution, although natural selection based on competition between organisms is of pivotal importance, it has been suggested that developmental constraints could play a significant role jointly with competition in limiting and channeling evolution, e.g., the reduced front legs of Tyrannosaurus might have been selected as a by-product of other adaptations such as larger hind legs.72,73 The emergence ofa unique genetic code clearly illustrates the workings of channeling: disallowance ofalternate codes by developmental constraints is even more important than elimination of alternate-coded species in achieving the one out of2 x 1019 selection ofthe universal code. In Chance and Necessity, Jacques Monod74 defined three frontiers that represent the foremost challenges of biology: the problem of life's origins, the riddle of the code's origins and the central nervous system. In this regard, the proving ofthe coevolution theory establishes the subdivision of the codon domains of precursor amino acids to accommodate the influx ofproduct amino acids from biosynthesis as the key to deciphering the riddle of genetic code structure. Just as the map of a country so often tells the story ofits history, the universal genetic code is a lasting inscription ofthe history of its coevolution with the primordial pathways of amino acid biosynthesis.

References Further Readings

1. Eigen M, Winkler-Oswatitsch R. Steps towards life. Oxford University Press, 1992.

2. Gesteland RF, Cech TR, Atkins JF eds. The RNA world 2nd ed. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1999.

3. Joyce GF. The antiquity of RNA-based evolution. Nature 2002; 418:214-221.

4. Lahav N. Biogenesis. Oxford University Press, 1999.

5. Wong JT. Coevolution theory of the genetic code at age thirty. BioEssays 2005; 27:416-425.

Specific References

6. Gamow G. Possible relation between deoxyribonucleic acid and protein structures. Nature 1954; 173:318.

7. Gilbert W. The RNA World. Nature 1886; 319:618.

8. Benner SA, Burgstaller P, Battersby TR et al. Did the RNA World exploit an expanded genetic alphabet? In: Gesteland RF, Cech TR, Atkins JF eds. The RNA World 2nd ed. Woodbury:Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. 1999; 163-181.

9. Motorin Y, Grosjean H. Appendix 1. Chemical structures and classification of posttranscriptionally modified nucleosides in RNA. In: Grosjean H, Benne R, eds. Modification and Editing of RNA. ASM Press 1998; 543-549.

10. Auffinger P, Westhof E. Appendix 5: Location and distribution of modified nucleotides in tRNA. In: Grosjean H, Benne R, eds. Modification and Editing of RNA. ASM Press 1998; 569-571.

11. Mat WK, Xue H, Wong JT. The genomics of LUCA. Frontiers in Biosc 2008; 13:5605-5613.

12. Lane BG. Historical perspectives on RNA nucleotide modifications. In: Grosjean H, Benne R, eds. Modification and Editing of RNA. ASM Press 1998; 1-20.

13. Cech TR, Herschlag D. Group I ribozymes: substrate recognition, catalytic strategies and comparative mechanistic analysis. In: Eckstein F, Lilley CMJ, eds. Catalytic RNA. Heidelberg:Springer-Verlag, 1996: 1-17.

14. L'Huillier PJ. Efficacy of hammerhead ribozymes targeting a-lactalbumin transcripts: experiments in cells and transgenic mice. In: Eckstein F, Lilley CMJ, eds. Catalytic RNA. Heidelberg:Springer-Verlag ,1996; 284-300.

15. Wong JT, Xue H. Self-perfecting evolution of heteropolymer building blocks and sequences as the basis of life. In: Palyi G, Zucchi C, Caglioti L, eds. Fundamentals of Life. Paris:Elsevier, 2002: 473-494.

16. Wong JT. Origin of genetically encoded protein synthesis: a model based on selection for RNA peptidation. Orig Life Evol Biosph 1991; 21:165-176.

17. Zhang B, Cech TR. Peptide bond formation by in vitro selected ribozymes. Nature 1997; 390:96-100.

18. Illangasekare M, Sanchez G, Nickles T et al. Aminoacyl-RNA synthesis catalyzed by an RNA. Science 1995; 267:643-647.

19. Saito H, Kourouklis D, Suga H. An in vitro evolved precursor tRNA with aminoacylation activity. EMBO J 2001; 20:1797-1806.

20. Robertson MP, Knudsen SM, Ellington AD. In vitro selection of ribozymes dependent on peptides for activity. RNA 2004; 10:114-127.

21. Roth A, Breaker RR. An amino acid as a cofactor for a catalytic poly-nucleotide. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95:6027-6031.

22. Lautru S, Challis GL. Substrate recognition by nonribosomal peptide synthetase multi-enzymes. Microbiol 2004; 150:1629-1636.

23. Szathmary E. Coding coenzyme handles: a hypothesis for the origin of the genetic code. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1993; 90:9916-9920.

24. Schimmel P, Henderson B. Possible role of aminoacyl-RNA complexes in noncoded peptide synthesis and origin of coded synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994; 91:11283-11286.

25. Schimmel P, Ribas de Pouplana L. Transfer RNA: from minihelix to genetic code. Cell 1995; 81:983-986.

26. Wong JT. A coevolution theory of the genetic code. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1975; 72:1909-1912.

27. Wong JT. Co-evolution of the genetic code and amino acid biosynthesis. Trends Biochem Sci 1981; 6:33-36.

28. Wong JT. The evolution of a universal genetic code. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1976; 73:2336-2340.

29. Li Y, Zhao Y, Hatfield S et al. Dipeptide seryl-histidine and related oligopeptides cleave DNA, protein and carboxyl ester. Bioorg Med Chem 2000; 8:2675-2680.

30. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posttranslational_modification.

31. Crick FHC. The origin of the genetic code. J Mol Biol 1968; 38:367-379.

32. Sonneborn TM. Degeneracy of the genetic code, extent, nature and genetic implications. In: Bryson V, Vogel HJ, eds. Evolving genes and proteins. New York: Academic Press 1965: 379-397.

33. Woese CR, Dugre DH, Dugre SA et al. On the fundamental nature and evolution of the genetic code. Cold Spring Harbour Symp Quant Biol 1966; 31:723-736.

34. Freeland SJ, Hurst LD. The genetic code is one in a million. J Mol Evol 1998; 47:238-248.

35. Freeland SJ, Wu T, Keulman N. The case for an error minimizing standard genetic code. Orig Life Evol Biosph 2003; 33:457-477.

36. Ardell DH, Sella G. No accident: genetic codes freeze in error-correcting patterns of the standard genetic code. Phil Trans R Soc London B 2002; 357:1625-1642.

37. Grantham R. Amino acid difference formula to help explain protein evolution. Science 1974; 185:862-864.

38. Wong JT. Role of minimization of chemical distances between amino acids in the evolution of the genetic code. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1980; 77:1083-1086.

39. Di Giulio M, Medugno M. The historical factor: the biosynthetic relationships between amino acids and their physicochemical properties in the origin of the genetic code. J Mol Evol 1998; 46:615-621.

40. Rodin S, Rodin A, Ohno S. The presence of codon-anticodon pairs in the acceptor stems of tRNAs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996; 93:4537-4542.

41. Lacey JC Jr, Wickramasinghe NSMD, Cook GW. Experimental studies on the origin of the genetic code and the process of protein synthesis: a review update. Orig Life Evol Biosp 1992; 22:243-275.

42. Jungck JR. The genetic code as a periodic table. J Mol Evol 1978; 11:211-224.

43. Knight R, Landweber LF, Yarus M. Tests of a stereochemical genetic code. In: Lapointe J, Brakier-Gingras L eds. Translation Mechanisms. Landes Bioscence 2003; 115-12.

44. Legiewicz M, Yarus M. A more complex isoleucine aptamer with a cognate triplet. J Biol Chem 2005; 280:19815-19822.

45. Hendry LB, Bransome ED Jr, Hulson MS et al. First approximation of a stereochemical rationale for the genetic code based on the topography and physicochemical properties of "cavities" constructed from models of DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1981; 78:7440-7444.

46. Shimizu M. Molecular basis for the genetic code. J Mol Evol 1982; 18:297-303.

47. Seligman H, Amzallag GN. Chemical interactions between amino acid and RNA: multiplicity of the levels of specificity explains origin of the genetic code. Naturwissen 2002; 89:542-551.

48. Pelc SR. Correlation between coding triplets and amino acids. Nature 1965; 207:597-599.

49. Dillon LS. The origins of the genetic code. Bot Rev 1973; 39:301-345.

50. Wong JT, Bronskill PM. Inadequacy of prebiotic synthesis as origin of proteinous amino acids. J Mol Evol 1979; 13:115-125.

51. Wong JT. Question 6: Coevolution theory of the genetic code: a proven theory. Orig Life Evol Biosph 2007; 37:403-408.

52. Di Giulio M. The coevolution theory of the origin of the genetic code. Physics Life Rev 2004; 1:128-137.

53. Trifonov EN, Gabdank I, Barash D et al. Primordia vita. Deconvolution from modern sequences. Orig Life Evol Biosph 2006; 36:559-565.

54. Wong JT, Chen J, Mat WK et al. Polyphasic evidence delineating the root of life and roots of biological domains. Gene 2007; 403:39-52.

55. O'Donoghue P, Sethi A, Woese CR et al. The evolutionary history of Cys-tRNACys formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102:19003-19008.

56. Sauerwald A, Zhu W, Major TA et al. RNA-dependent cysteine biosynthesis in archaea. Science 2005; 307:1969-1972.

57. Commans S, Bock A. Selenocysteine inserting tRNAs: an overview. FEMS Microb Rev 1999; 23:335-351.

58. Feng L, Sheppard K, Namgoong S et al. Aminoacyl-tRNA synthesis by pretranslational amino acid modification. RNA Biology 2004; 1:16-20.

59. Wong JT. Membership mutation of the genetic code: loss of fitness by tryptophan. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1983; 80:6303-6306.

60. Bronskill PM, Wong JT. Suppression of fluorescence of tryptophan residues in proteins by replacement with 4-fluorotryptophan. Biochem J 1988; 249:305-308.

61. Mat FWK, Xue H, Wong JT. Genetic encoding of 4-,5-,6-fluorotryp-tophans: Role of oligogenic barriers. Am Soc Microbiol 104th Meeting 2004; R-029.

62. Abascal F, Posada D, Knight RD et al. Parallel evolution of the genetic code in arthropod mitochondrial genomes. PLoS Biology 2006; 4:e127.

63. Bacher JM, Ellington AD. Selection and characterization of Escherichia coli variants capable of growth on otherwise toxic tryptophan analogues. J Bacteriol 2001; 183:5414-5425.

64. Bacher JM, Ellington AD. The directed evolution of organismic chemistry: unnatural amino acid incorporation. In: Lapointe J, Brakier-Gingras L eds, Translation Mechanisms. Landes Bioscences 2003; 80-94.

65. Bacher JM, Hughes RA, Wong JT et al. Evolving new genetic codes. Trends Ecol Evol 2004; 19:69-75.

66. Xie J, Schultz PG. Adding amino acids to the to the genetic repertoire. Curr Opin Chem Biol 2005; 9:5548-554.

67. Budisa N. Engineering the genetic code. Wiley-VCH. 2006;

68. Kwok Y, Wong JT. Evolutionary relationships between halobacterium cutirubrum and eukaryotes determined by use of aminoacyl-tRNA syn-thetases as phylogenetic probes. Can J Biochem 1980; 58:213-218.

69. Hesman T. Code breakers. Scientists are altering bacteria in a most fundamental way. Science News 2000; 157:360-362.

70. Cohen P. Life the sequel. New Scientist 2000; 167:32-36.

71. Wong JT. Kinetics of enzyme mechanisms. London:Academic Press, 1975: 200-201.

72. Gould SJ, Lewontin RC. The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglos-sian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme. Proc Roy Soc London B 1979; 205:581-598.

73. Larson EJ. Evolution. New York:Modern Library, 2004: 280-281.

74. Monod J. Chance and Necessity. New York:Vintage Books, 1972: 138-148.

0 0

Post a comment