Gametophyte Generation

I n this chapter, in fact throughout this book, the primary focus is on the sporophyte generation of vascular plants. This is not by choice, but rather reflects the general paucity of information about the gametophyte phase in most fossil plants. Although there is some information about the game-tophytes in certain seed plants (Millay and Eggert, 1974; Chapter 14), information about fossil vascular plant game-tophytes is generally rare. Until recently this has been especially true in discussions of early land plants and has resulted in a variety of theories to explain both the origin of the dominant sporophyte phase and the absence of gametophytes in the fossil record (Chapter 6). Some of these ideas have influenced the interpretation of the Rhynie chert sporophytes.

One of the early theories suggested that Aglaophyton major represented the sporophyte and Rhynia gwynne-vaughanii, the free-living gametophyte phase of a single plant (Pant, 1962). The idea gained support from the homologous theory of the alternation of generations (Chapter 6), since there were no specimens of R. gwynne-vaughanii known to possess sporangia at that time. This theory has been abandoned since R. gwynne-vaughanii was subsequently shown to possess terminal sporangia (Edwards, 1980) and A. major is now known to be structurally somewhat different from a vascular plant.

Another theory suggested that the small protrusions near the base of R. gwynne-vaughanii axes represented archegonia (Lemoigne, 1968). According to this hypothesis, the rhizoma-tous portion of the plant represented the gametophyte phase and the aerial upright axes bearing sporangia constituted the spo-rophyte. Such a situation might be viewed as evidence for the antithetic theory and parallels the life history in modern bryo-phytes, where the sporophyte phase is permanently parasitic on the gametophyte. Although this hypothesis cannot be totally discounted, to date there is little structural evidence in the form of a transitional zone or foot-like structure, which should be present at the base of all R. gwynne-vaughanii plants.

One fossil that was thought to support the hypothesis of a bryophyte-like gametophyte is Horneophyton lignieri.

Several features of this genus are similar to those found in bryophytes, especially the columellate sporangia and corm-like base. Some suggested that the relatively simple modern hornwort Anthoceros could represent an early morphological type that would lead to the more complex sporophyte of H. lignieri. It is important to understand that these ideas were advanced at a time when many hypothesized that the bryophytes represented an intermediate stage in the evolution of vascular plants from the green algae. Today the hornworts and bryophytes are mostly considered to be paraphyletic (Chapter 5). There is continuing disagreement, however, as to whether the liverworts or the hornworts represent the basal group among the bryophytes (Nickrent et al., 2000; Friedman et al., 2004; Shaw and Renzaglia, 2004). We are still a long way from understanding the evolution of the sporophyte of vascular plants, as well as the nature of the plant body in a number of fossils that exhibit a bryophytic level of organization.

Some exceptionally well-preserved fossils that do contribute to a better understanding of the sporophyte-gametophyte relationship in early land plants have been described by the Remys (FIG. 8.47) from the Rhynie chert (Remy and Remy, 1980a, b; Remy et al., 1993). One of these is Lyonophyton rhyniensis (FIG. 8.48), a small axis that terminates in a shallow, bowl-shaped structure (~5.0mm in diameter), described as a gametangiophore (gametophyte) (Remy and Hass, 1991a). Antheridia are distributed over the entire upper surface. Each antheridium is characterized by a central mass of sterile tissue (columella), and many contain exceptionally well-preserved, coiled spermatozoids (FIG. 8.49). Stomata (FIG. 8.50 ) occur on the lower surface of the gametangi-ophore bowl. In the center of the stalk are dark, elongated conducting cells which do not extend into the bowl itself.

figure 8.47 Renate and Winfried Remy. (Courtesy D. Remy.)
figure 8.48 Longitudinal section of Lyonophyton rhyniensis antheridiophore showing central conducting strand (arrow) and antheridia in cup-shaped distal end (Devonian). Bar = 2 mm. (Courtesy H. Kerp.)

The similarity of epidermal cells and conducting elements has been used to demonstrate that Lyonophyton rhyniensis is the gametophyte of Aglaophyton major.

Kidstonophyton discoides (FIG. 8.51) is another gametophyte discovered in the Rhynie chert that resembles Lyonophyton (Remy and Hass, 1991b). It consists of a stalk terminating in a shallow, cup-shaped structure (antheridiophore) (FIG. 8.52) that contains numerous antheridia interspersed among ridges of sterile tissue. Spermatozoids have also been described. The sporophyte in the Kidstonophyton life cycle is Nothia aphylla.

Associated with these two taxa in the Rhynie chert is another gametophyte that Remy and Hass (1991c) named Langiophyton mackiei (Fig. 8.32). This plant consists of upright axes ~6.0mm long; each terminates in a flattened, peltate structure from which arise numerous (about 30) archegonia. The upper surface of the peltate disk is irregular, and each archegonium is characterized by an elongated neck and deep-seated venter. Antheridiophores are bowl-shaped

figure 8.49 Section of antheridium showing coiled sperm (Devonian). Bar = 30pm. (Courtesy H. Kerp.)

and contain up to 50 antheridia. Langiophyton mackiei is the gametophyte of Horneophyton lignieri. The most recent game-tophyte described from the Rhynie chert is Remyophyton deli-catum (FIGS. 8.53, 8.54) (Kerp et al., 2004). Unlike the other Rhynie chert gametophytes, those of R. delicatum are attached to rhizoid-bearing protocorms (Fig. 8.38). The upright axes possess S-type conducting elements like those of the sporophyte R. gwynne-vaughanii. Gametangiophores are unisexual with the larger ones bearing archegonia.

All of the gametophytes known to date from the Rhynie chert are morphologically quite similar to one another, each consisting of an elongated stalk bearing a flattened or saucer-shaped head that contains antheridia or archegonia (FIG. 8.55 ). These gametophytes appear similar in organization to those found in some members of the hepatic order Marchantiales (Chapter 5), which produce upright antheridiophores and archegoniophores from a prostrate thallus. In the Rhynie chert gametophytes, at least one taxon, Remyophyton delicatum, appears to arise from a protocorm-like structure, not a thallus. All possess stomata and conducting elements, and some have been demonstrated

figure 8.50 Paradermal section of Lyonophyton rhynien-sis gametangiophore showing stoma (Devonian). Bar = 80pm. (Courtesy H. Kerp.)
figure 8.51 Diagrammatic section of distal end of Kidstonophyton discoides antheridiophore (Devonian). (From Taylor and Taylor, 1993.)

to be endomycorrhizal (FIG. 8.56) (Taylor et al., 2005c). As more gametophytes are discovered it will be interesting to see if any of the antheridiophores and archegoniophores are found attached to some type of thallus-like structure.

figure 8.52 Longitudinal section of distal end of Kidstonophyton discoides antheridiophore showing several anth-eridia (arrows). Compare with FIG. 8.51. (Bar = 1 mm).
Remyophyton Delicatum
figure 8.53 Several Remyophyton delicatum gametangiophores with antheridia (arrows) (Devonian). Bar = 2mm. (Courtesy H. Kerp.)

Morphologically, Lyonophyton, Langiophyton, Kidstonophyton, and Remyophyton show some similarity to the Early Devonian compression genus Sciadophyton (FIG. 8.57), which also consists of radiating axes terminating in cuplike structures (FIG. 8.58) (Remy et al., 1980a, b; Schweitzer, 1980a). A few elongated cells in the center of the axis are interpreted as conducting elements, but because the specimens are known only as compressions, these features remain equivocal. Although initially regarded as a sporophyte, the presence of oval bodies on the inner surface of the cup, similar in size to those in the Rhynie chert gametophytes, are suggestive of gametangia (Kenrick and Crane, 1997a) . The presence of Sciadophyton in the same rocks with several morphological forms considered to be developmental stages prompted Schweitzer (1981) to regard Sciadophyton as the gametophyte of Stockmansella langii. Kenrick et al. (1991b), however, based on mineral casts of the conducting elements, interpret Sciadophyton as the gametophyte of either Stockmansella or Huvenia . As suggested by Remy et al. (1992), it is highly probable that the

figure 8.54 Distal end of Remyophyton delicatum gametan-giophore showing archegonium (arrow) (Devonian). Bar = 300 pm. (Courtesy H. Kerp.)
figure 8.55 Diagrammatic representation of a population of Lyonophyton gametangiophores associated with mycorrhizae.
Saprophyte Microscopy

figure 8.56 Arbuscules (arrows) in gametangiophore of Lyonophyton rhyniensis (Devonian) Bar = 36 pm (Courtesy of H. Kerp.)

morphotaxon Sciadophyton represents a gametophyte stage of several early land plants. The anatomical and morphological similarity of the gametophytes described from the Rhynie chert to date would appear to strengthen Remy's hypothesis.

figure 8.56 Arbuscules (arrows) in gametangiophore of Lyonophyton rhyniensis (Devonian) Bar = 36 pm (Courtesy of H. Kerp.)

figure 8.57 Suggested reconstruction of Sciadophyton sp. (Devonian). (From Taylor and Taylor, 1993.)
figure 8.58 Sciadophyton steinmannii, a gametophyte believed to belong to the sporophyte Zosterophyllum rhenanum (Devonian). Bar = 2 cm. (Courtesy BSPG.)

Calyculiphyton is an Emsian (Lower Devonian) compression fossil that may also represent a gametophyte (Remy et al., 1991). In this type, elongate axes terminate in cup-shaped structures that morphologically look much like those of Sciadophyton.

The anatomically preserved gametophytes from the Rhynie chert provide the first real fossil evidence that pertains to the evolution of alternation of generations. The nature of the conducting strand and relationship to the sporophyte phase of Rhynie chert plants substantiate the existence of free-living, terrestrial gametophytes as early as the Early Devonian. The conducting strand of Aglaophyton major and several other early land plants provided the impetus to reevaluate the conducting elements of many early land plants and to use this feature to establish the biological affinities of the sporo-phyte and gametophyte phase. To date there is little evidence of post-fertilization stages or the new sporophyte (embryo) in any early land plants. Kerp et al. (2004) described and illustrated some tissue extending from an archegonial neck of Remyophyton delicatum that might represent the gameto-phyte-sporophyte junction and development of the new sporophyte generation of R. gwynne-vaughanii.

Was this article helpful?

+6 0


  • julie
    What is the name of gametophyte stage of Rhynia gwynnevaughanii?
    3 years ago
  • abdullah
    Which is not associated with the gametophyte generation (figure 16.3)?
    2 years ago

Post a comment